Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v Chiron Corp [2000] FCA 346 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE ) PATENTS ) – discovery in a revocation suit in respect of a patent – general principles – appropriate discovery in relation to issues of obviousness and sufficiency – novelty, fair basis and false suggestion – discovery in a proceeding involving amendment distinguished – the Court's discretion – whether discovery should be ordered of documents generated in other jurisdictions – desirability of "group" discovery where a multi-national group of companies is concerned – date to which discovery should be ordered in relation to (a) obviousness; (b) sufficiency – effect of too wide demand for discovery. Federal Court Rules, Order 15 r 3 Murex Diagnostics Australia Pty Limited v Chiron Corporation (1995) 55 FCR 194 applied Murex Diagnostics Australia Pty Ltd v Chiron Corporation (No 2) (1995) 62 FCR 424 applied Wimmera Industrial Minerals Pty Ltd v RGC Mineral Sands Ltd (Mansfield J, 30 March 1998, unreported) applied Temmler v Knoll Laboratories (Australia) Pty Ltd (1969) 43 ALJR 363 applied Intalite International NV v Cellular Ceilings Ltd (No 1) [1987] RPC 532 applied Avery Ld v Ashworth, Son & Co Ld (1915) 32 RPC 463 applied Unilever plc v Chefaro Proprietaries Ltd [1994] FSR 135 referred to Dart Industries Inc v Prestige Group (Australia) Pty Ltd (Ashley J, Supreme Court of Victoria, 4 November 1991, unreported) applied The Wellcome Foundation Limited v V.R. Laboratories (Aust) Proprietary Limited (1981) 148 CLR 262 applied Schering Agrochemicals Ltd v ABM Chemicals Ltd [1987] RPC 185 applied Haslam Co v Hall (1888) 5 RPC 1 applied Vickers plc v Horsell Graphic Industries Ltd [1988] RPC 421 referred to Sabre Corporation Pty Ltd v Russ Kalvin's Hair Care Company (1993) 46 FCR 428 referred to Burgundy Royale v Westpac Banking Corporation (Foster J, 21 February 1990, unreported) referred to Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Carter Holt Harvey Tissue Australia Ltd (1997) 37 IPR 293 referred to Molnlycke AB v Procter & Gamble Ltd (No 3) [1990] RPC 498 referred to Rescare Ltd v Anaesthetic Supplies Pty Ltd (1992) 111 ALR 205 referred to Anaesthetic Supplies Pty Ltd v Rescare Ltd (1994) 50 FCR 1 referred to Cave Holdings Pty Ltd v Taperline Pty Ltd (1985) 4 IPR 476 referred to Wimmera Industrial Minerals Pty Ltd v RGC Mineral Sands Ltd (1997) 40 IPR 110 referred to Re Hsiung's Patent [1992] RPC 497 referred to Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd v Carr's Paper Ltd [1989] RPC 713 referred to F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG v CHIRON CORPORATION & ANOR NG 1029 of 1997 BURCHETT J 24 MARCH 2000 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate