Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sharples v Hanson, In the matter of Sharples [2000] FCA 352 RE: TERRY PATRICK SHARPLES; EX PARTE: TERRY PATRICK SHARPLES v PAULINE LEE HANSON as representative of herself and all members of PAULINE HANSON'S ONE NATION (as registered under the Electoral Act 1992 Qld) Q 7515 of 1999 DOWSETT J 11 FEBRUARY 2000 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 7515 OF 1999
RE: TERRY PATRICK SHARPLES
A DEBTOR
EX PARTE: TERRY PARTRICK SHARPLES
APPLICANT
AND: PAULINE LEE HANSON as representative of herself and all members of PAULINE HANSON'S ONE NATION (as registered under the Electoral Act 1992 Qld)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 FEBRUARY 2000
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application to set aside a bankruptcy notice is refused. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application to set aside the bankruptcy notice. 3. The application for an order that Mr English produce and delivery up documents is dismissed. 4. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application for an order for production and delivery up of documents. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 7515 OF 1999
RE: TERRY PATRICK SHARPLES
A DEBTOR
EX PARTE: TERRY PARTRICK SHARPLES
APPLICANT
AND: PAULINE LEE HANSON as representative of herself and all members of PAULINE HANSON'S ONE NATION (as registered under the Electoral Act 1992 Qld)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE: 11 FEBRUARY 2000
PLACE: BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 The present applicant seeks to set aside a bankruptcy notice directed to him. In addition he alleges that if he is indebted in respect of the subject matter of the notice, he is entitled to an indemnity from Mr Tony Abbott MP, a Federal Minister. He claims to be entitled to join Mr Abbott as a third party in these proceedings. I can see no basis for that. If there is a claim against Mr Abbott, it should be pursued in a court of appropriate jurisdiction. There is no reason why such a claim should be sorted out in the bankruptcy jurisdiction, and in those circumstances, I refuse the application. 2 I order the applicant to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application to join Mr Abbott.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate