Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bryant, in the matter of Adrian Cecil Bryant v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2000] FCA 367 BANKRUPTCY – application for annulment of a sequestration order – whether sequestration order should have been made – whether existence of a claim against a third party constitutes a ground for annulment pursuant to s 153B of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – where no evidence of substance of claim – where claim not prosecuted by the Official Trustee – where claim not prosecuted by the respondent
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – where order for substituted service of creditor's petition – where no appearance by debtor at the hearing of the petition – whether denial of procedural fairness or natural justice – whether debtor given reasonable opportunity of appearing and presenting his case Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 60(3) & 153B Federal Court Rules, O 77 r 19 Cameron v Cole (1943) 68 CLR 571, applied IN THE MATTER OF ADRIAN CECIL BRYANT ADRIAN CECIL BRYANT v AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED (ACN 005 357 552) N 8123 OF 1999 EMMETT J 15 MARCH 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 8123 OF 1999
BETWEEN: ADRIAN CECIL BRYANT
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED
ACN 005 357 552
Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 MARCH 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 8123 OF 1999
IN THE MATTER OF ADRIAN CECIL BRYANT
BETWEEN: ADRIAN CECIL BRYANT
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate