Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WY v National Crime Authority [2000] FCA 451 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – right of review from decision of the Chairman of the National Crime Authority – whether the applicant is entitled to a review of the decision of the Chairman pursuant to both the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act and the National Crime Authority Act ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – review of decision of Chairman of the National Crime Authority – whether applicant entitled to challenge validity of decision on facts arising subsequently to the decision PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – production of documents – public interest immunity claim by National Crime Authority – whether applicant challenging decision of Chairman of National Crime Authority entitled to Chairman's personal notes made in preparation for giving written reasons for decision PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – production of documents – warrants – whether applicant is entitled to have access to warrant allegedly issued for his arrest and the information laid on which that warrant was based NSW Associated Blue-Metal Quarries Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1955) 94 CLR 509, referred to Hope v Council of the City of Bathurst (1980) 144 CLR 1, referred to AB v National Crime Authority (1998) 85 FCR 538, referred to C v National Crime Authority (1988) 78 ALR 338, considered Bank of Valletta PLC v National Crime Authority and Another (1999) 165 ALR 60, referred to AB v National Crime Authority (1997-1998) 49 ALD 397, considered Karmas v NSW Land & Housing Corporation (New South Wales Supreme Court, Dunford J, unreported, 12 February 1999), followed Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 10 Federal Court Rules, Order 4 rule 6, Order 57 rules 1 and 2(3) National Crime Authority Act 1984 (Cth), ss 13, 19, 25, 28, 29, 30, 32, 57 WY v NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY & JOHN BROOME N 714 OF 1999 WY v NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY N 715 OF 1999 EINFELD J 11 APRIL 2000 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate