Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dunwoody v Jefferson; In the matter of Dunwoody [2000] FCA 456 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - costs - whether the Trustees' application was reasonable - were the Trustees' costs "properly incurred" - should the Trustees retain the benefit of the indemnity out of the estate - was there a basis for indemnity costs. Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 64, 181 Re Beddoe; Downes v Colfam [1893] 1 Ch 547 Appl Re Bryant; Ex parte Gordon (1889) 6 Morrell 262 Cited Re Dusseck; Ex parte The Trustee v Australian Mosaic Flooring Ltd (1964) 20 ABC 159 Cited Adsett v Berlouis (1992) 37 FCR 201 Appl Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 Cited Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Cited IN THE MATTER OF JOHN ERNEST DUNWOODY; EX PARTE PHILIP GREGORY JEFFERSON AND JAY ARSCOTT STEVENSON Q7218 OF 1999 IN THE MATTER OF JOHN ERNEST DUNWOODY; PETER DUNWOODY AND McDONALD MURPHY MACHINERY PTY LTD v PHILIP GREGORY JEFFERSON AND JAY ARSCOTT STEVENSON Q7218 OF 1999 COOPER J BRISBANE 11 APRIL 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 7218 OF 1999
IN THE MATTER OF: JOHN ERNEST DUNWOODY
(A BANKRUPT)
EX PARTE: PHILIP GREGORY JEFFERSON AND JAY ARSCOTT STEVENSON
APPLICANTS
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 7233 OF 1999
IN THE MATTER OF: JOHN ERNEST DUNWOODY
(A BANKRUPT)
BETWEEN: PETER DUNWOODY
FIRST APPLICANT
McDONALD MURPHY MACHINERY PTY LTD
ACN 054 059 522
SECOND APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate