Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Steer v The Queen [2000] FCA 462 Criminal Law - appeal against sentence - principles governing Crown appeal - whether sentence manifestly inadequate.
Criminal Law - appeal against sentences - whether disparity between sentences imposed on co-offenders - whether sentence imposed on one offender manifestly inadequate, and on another manifestly excessive. Crimes Act 1900 (ACT), ss 429A, 449 and 449A Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 cited Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 applied The Queen v Blaskovic [1999] FCA 1306 referred to Watson v The Queen [2000] FCA 186 referred to R v Radloff (1996) 6 Tas R 99 referred to Inge v The Queen [1999] 166 ALR 312 applied R vKalajzich (1997) 94 A Crim R 41 discussed Crofts (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Grove J, 6 December 1996) cited King (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Grove J, 6 December 1996) referred to R v Isaacs (1997) 90 A Crim R 587 cited R v Storey (1998) 1 VR 359 followed The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 166 ALR 330 cited Chamberlain v The Queen [No 2] (1984) 153 CLR 521 applied Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 followed R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 applied R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 cited Malvaso v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 227 referred to Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 referred to R v Clarke [1996] 2 VR 520 referred to R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 cited R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 cited DPP v Carter [1998] 1 VR 601 cited DPP v Christie [1999] VSCA 171 applied R v Tait & Bartley (1979) 24 ALR referred to R v Hayes (1987) 29 A Crim R 452 referred to Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 referred to R v D'Ortenzio [1961] VR 432 applied R v Charles [1979] VR 8 referred to R v Cox (1991) 55 A Crim R 396 referred to R v Reardon (1996) 89 A Crim R 180 referred to R v Tisalandis [1982] 2 NSWLR 430 applied Matters No. AG 25 of 1998, AG 55 of 1998, AG 64 of 1998 and AG 118 of 1998 BARRY STEER v THE QUEEN, THE QUEEN v KATHY MARIE McFIE, JOHN TERENCE CONWAY v THE QUEEN and DANIEL SCOTT WILLIAMS v THE QUEEN MILES, von DOUSSA & WEINBERG JJ CANBERRA DATE 11 APRIL 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate