Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Klewer v Dutch [2000] FCA 509
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – prerogative writs and orders – whether Federal Court has accrued jurisdiction under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1993 (Cth) to issue writ of certiorari – whether writ of prohibition can be issued to prevent enforcement of decision found to be made with bias – whether remedy of prerogative writs available after conviction entered – conviction by magistrate of offence under s 1347 of the Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) – magistrate had presided in a number of cases in which applicant was a party and had decided them adversely to applicant on issues of credit – whether magistrate should have acceded to request that he disqualify himself for apparent bias where prosecution of applicant involved proof of fraud. Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 11(4), 13, 1066-D1, 1347 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 considered R v Murray & Cormie (1916) 22 CLR 437 cited Coward v Allen (1983-4) 52 ALR 320 cited Ex parte Malouf; Re Gee (1943) 43 SR(NSW) 195 cited Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407 followed Stack v Coast Securities (No 9) Pty Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 261 cited Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1987) 76 ALR 173 cited New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council v Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (1995) 131 ALR 559 referred to
LUCY PATRICIA KLEWER v
JENNY DUTCH AND MICHAEL DORING NG 453 OF 1998 HILL J SYDNEY 28 APRIL 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 453 OF 1998
BETWEEN: LUCY PATRICIA KLEWER
Applicant
AND: JENNY DUTCH
First Respondent
MICHAEL DORING
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate