Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tharairasa v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[2000] FCA 520
MIGRATION – refugees – decision of Refugee Review Tribunal that applicant not a person to whom Australia had protection obligations – whether s 424A of the Migration Act requires the Tribunal to give the applicant country information upon which it proposes to rely – whether Tribunal erred by not finding that a beating and subsequent torture constituted persecution – whether Tribunal erred in failing to observe procedures that were required to be observed by the Act.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 424A, 430, 476(1)(a)
Cho v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 55 ALD 487 referred to
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Cho (1999) 164 ALR 339 referred to
Meadows v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 54 ALD 654 referred to
Mohamed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 371 referred to
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 162 ALR 577 referred to
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [1999] FCA 1681 followed
Xu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1741 referred to
Montes-Granados v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 60 followed
Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham [2000] HCA 1 distinguished
RASAKUMAR THARAIRASA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION &
MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
W 158 of 1999
CARR J
20 APRIL 2000
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 158 OF 1999
BETWEEN: RASAKUMAR THARAIRASA
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND
MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: CARR J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate