Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Recyclers of Australia Pty Ltd v Hettinga Equipment Inc [2000] FCA 547 ARBITRATION – stay of proceeding – whether determination of whether a matter is capable of settlement by arbitration is to be determined by reference to the issues pleaded or to the subject matter of the underlying dispute – whether claims severable from, independent of or ancillary to the arbitrable claims should be stayed – whether under the law of Iowa claims of misrepresentation in respect of pre-contractual and post-contractual representations is a dispute arising under the contract WORDS AND PHRASES – "matter" International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) s 7(2) Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. 1 et seq Iowa Uniform Arbitration Act, I.C.A. Chapter 679A Flakt Australia Ltd v Wilkins & Davies Construction Co Ltd [1979] 2 NSWLR 243 - considered Allergan Pharmaceuticals Inc v Bausch and Lomb Inc (1985) 7 ATPR 40-636 - considered Tanning Research Laboratories Inc v O'Brien (1990) 169 CLR 332 - applied Hooper v Kirella (1999) 167 ALR 358 – cited IBM Australia v National Distribution Services [1991] 22 NSWLR 466 – cited Francis Travel Marketing Pty Ltd v Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd (1996) 39 NSWLR 160 – cited Amin Rasheed Shipping Corp v Kuwait Insurance Co [1984] 1 AC 50 - cited Prima Paint Corporation v Flood & Conklin Manufacturing. Co. 388 U.S. 395 (1967) – cited Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital v Mercury Construction Corporation 460 U.S. 1 (1983) - considered Southland v Keating 465 U.S. 1 (1984) - cited Mastrobuono v Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc 514 U.S. 52 (1995) - cited Doctor's Associates Inc v Casarotto 517 U.S. 681 (1996) - considered Wesley Retirement Services Inc v Hansen Lind Meyer Inc 594 N.W. 2d 22 (Iowa 1999) – considered Volt Information Sciences Inc v Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University 489 U.S. 468 (1989) – considered Iowa Telephone Association v City of Hawarden 589 N.W. 2d 245 (Iowa 1999) - cited Griffin v Semperit of America Inc 414 F.Supp. 1384 (Sd. Tex. 1976) – considered In re Kinoshita and Co 287 F.2d 951 (2d Cir. 1961) – considered Mediterranean Enterprises Inc v Ssangyong Corporation 708 F.2d 1458 (1983) - considered Tracer Research v National Environmental Services Co 42 F.3d 1292 (9th Cir. 1994) – cited Weinrott v Carp 298 N.E.2d 42 (1973, N.Y.) – cited Terra International Inc v Mississippi Chemical Corporation 119 F.3d 688 (1997) – applied Paper Products Pty Ltd v Tomlinsons (Rochdale) Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 439 - cited Hi-Fert Pty Ltd v Kiukiang Maritime Carriers Inc (1998) 159 ALR 142 - cited Dodwell & Co (Aust) Pty Ltd v Moss Security Ltd Federal Court, Wilcox J (unreported, 11 April 1990) – considered RECYCLERS OF AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v HETTINGA EQUIPMENT INC VG 565 OF 1999 JUDGE: MERKEL J PLACE: MELBOURNE DATE: 30 MAY 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate