Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Thomas (Trustee), in the matter of Gidley (Bankrupt) v Clairbrook [2000] FCA 564
BANKRUPTCY – preference – s 122 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 – whether creditor "acted in good faith". Bankruptcy Act 1966 – s 122 IN THE MATTER OF ALICE ISOBELLE GIDLEY AND RICHARD JOHN SHEARS GAVIN FREDERICK CRICHTON THOMAS (AS OFFICIAL TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ALICE ISOBELLE GIDLEY AND RICHARD JOHN SHEARS) V LORRAINE CLAIRBROOK (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS LIBERTO) N 7930 OF 1999 JUDGE: BEAUMONT J DATE: 17 APRIL 2000 PLACE: SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 7930 OF 1999
IN THE MATTER OF: ALICE ISOBELLE GIDLEY AND RICHARD JOHN SHEARS
BETWEEN: GAVIN FREDERICK CRICHTON THOMAS (AS OFFICIAL TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ALICE ISOBELLE GIDLEY AND RICHARD JOHN SHEARS)
APPLICANT
AND: LORRAINE CLAIRBROOK (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS LIBERTO)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BEAUMONT J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 APRIL 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. There be judgment for the applicant in the sum of $20,000. 2. There be judgment for the applicant for pre-judgment interest at New South Wales Supreme Court prescribed rates from 10 August 1999 until this day. 3. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 7930 OF 1999
IN THE MATTER OF: ALICE ISOBELLE GIDLEY AND RICHARD JOHN SHEARS
BETWEEN: GAVIN FREDERICK CRICHTON THOMAS (AS OFFICIAL TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ALICE ISOBELLE GIDLEY AND RICHARD JOHN SHEARS)
APPLICANT
AND: LORRAINE CLAIRBROOK (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS LIBERTO)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate