Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 580 MIGRATION – refusal of protection visa – application for review to Refugee Review Tribunal – whether application for review out of time – when appellant "notified" of decision of delegate of Minister – notice of decision sent by registered mail to appellant's address – whether reg 5.03 deems notification to have been given where notice sent by registered mail – whether Tribunal erred in determining that it did not have jurisdiction to grant a protection visa because the application was out of time. MIGRATION – validity of reg 5.03 of Migration Regulations. Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 29 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 53, 66, 66(1), 412, 412(1)(b), 414, 420, 504(1)(e) Migration Regulations reg 4.31 and reg 5.03 Shrestha v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (Sackville J, 13 October 1997, unreported) referred to Dawai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 71 FCR 379 referred to Santos v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 74 FCR 334 referred to Tabet v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 75 FCR 446 referred to Harinder Pal Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 613 applied
DHARMINDER SINGH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND
MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 982 OF 1999
O'CONNOR, TAMBERLIN & MANSFIELD JJ 12 MAY 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 982 OF 1999
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE
OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: DHARMINDER SINGH
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION
AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: O'CONNOR, TAMBERLIN & MANSFIELD JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 12 MAY 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate