Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rafiqul v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 622
MIGRATION – refugees – protection visa – government policy – whether Refugee Review Tribunal examined the application on its merits – error of law – well-founded fear of persecution. Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476, 476(1)(d), 476(1)(e), 476(3)(c) Abebe v Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 162 ALR 1 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 referred to Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred to Islam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 362 referred to Hossen v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 363 referred to
1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees MOHAMMED RAFIQUL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W 124 OF 1999 LEE J 12 MAY 2000 SYDNEY (HEARD IN PERTH)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 124 OF 1999
BETWEEN: MOHAMMED RAFIQUL
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LEE J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 MAY 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN PERTH)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 124 OF 1999
BETWEEN: MOHAMMED RAFIQUL
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate