Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pirapakaran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 624 MIGRATION – application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal refusing grant of protection visa – whether decision adequately sets out finding on material questions of fact by reference to the evidence upon which the findings of fact were based – where demands made of applicant due to perception that they were wealthy, rather than because they were Tamil – where it was unnecessary for the Tribunal to consider the question of relocation as it did not accept that the applicants had a well-founded fear of persecution – Tribunal is not obliged to refer to information inconsistent with its findings on material facts – where information relied upon was more recent than other inconsistent material, it is not an appropriate case to consider whether RRT is subject to a duty to enquire – whether Tribunal should have considered whether the daughter had independent claims to a protection visa, when no independent claim was put to that effect
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 430, 430(1), 430(1)(d), 481 Migration Regulations Sch 1, cl 866, cl 866.222 Alphonsus v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 289 distinguished Perampalam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1999) 84 FCR 274 referred to Santhikumar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1777 applied Doss v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1780 applied Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407 applied Thangavel v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 53 referred to Iyer RRT N97/18645 referred to Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1998) 160 ALR 24 referred to Thevendram v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 182 referred to INTHUMATHY PIRAPAKARAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 120 OF 2000 HELY J 15 MAY 2000 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate