Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hills Grammar School v Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission [2000] FCA 658 DISCRIMINATION LAW – application for enrolment at a private school – applicant suffers from spina bifida - whether the school may suffer "unjustifiable hardship" within the meaning of s 22 of the Disability Discrimination Act if it were compelled to admit the pupil – whether the extent of hardship should be measured against the maximum time the student could possibly be enrolled in the school - whether the extent of financial hardship claimed must be assessed as an exact figure DISCRIMINATION LAW – burden of proving "unjustifiable hardship" within the meaning of s 22 of the Disability Discrimination Act – whether the burden is placed on the respondent, or is shared by both parties ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – reasons of an administrative decision maker – where the relevant legislation required the decision maker to promote the elimination of discrimination - where the decision maker's reasons discussed matters not necessary for the decision – whether the decision maker took account of irrelevant considerations – whether the decision maker relied on irrelevant considerations ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – reasons of an administrative decision maker – whether reasons are sufficient – whether the reasons disclosed that the decision maker did not consider relevant evidence - whether the reasons disclosed the basis on which the decision maker weighed and evaluated the evidence Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5 and 6 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 5, 6, 11, 22 and 69 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 11 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 followed Attorney-General v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 applied Scott v Telstra [1995] EOC 92 - 717 cited L v Minister for Education [1996] EOC 92-787 distinguished K v N School (QLD ADT, 7 January 1997, unreported) distinguished Commonwealth of Australia v Introvigne (1982) 150 CLR 258 cited Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 cited Housing Commission of New South Wales v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 378 followed Soulemezis v Dudley Holdings Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 followed HILLS GRAMMAR SCHOOL v HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION N794 of 1999 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 18 MAY 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate