Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Elliott v Seymour (No 2) [2000] FCA 694
JOHN DORMAN ELLIOTT v SERGEANT DOUGLAS SEYMOUR and THOMAS SHERMAN and NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY and DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR THE STATE OF VICTORIA and AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION and STEVEN MARSHALL CRABB VG 411 of 1993 RYAN J 26 MAY 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG411 OF 1993
BETWEEN: JOHN DORMAN ELLIOTT
Applicant
AND: SERGEANT DOUGLAS SEYMOUR
First Respondent
THOMAS SHERMAN
Second Respondent
NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY
Third Respondent
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR THE STATE OF VICTORIA
Fourth Respondent
AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION
Fifth Respondent
STEVEN MARSHALL CRABB
Sixth Respondent JUDGE: RYAN J
DATE OF ORDER: 26 MAY 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicant file and serve by 21 July 2000 a draft further amended statement of claim confined to the causes of action in conspiracy and misfeasance in a public office referred to in the reasons for judgment published this day. 2. The applicant's motion on notice dated 4 February 1998, the first, second and third respondents' motion on notice dated 4 December 1997, the fourth respondent's amended motion on notice dated 27 April 1998 and the sixth respondent's motion on notice filed on 11 December 1998 be adjourned to a date to be fixed being not earlier than 7 August 2000. 3. The question of the costs of all parties of and incidental to the motions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Order and of and incidental to the hearings on 27 and 28 September 1999 be stood over to the date to be fixed pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Order. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate