Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Chiou v Wang [2000] FCA 713
MAREVA INJUNCTION - Mareva-type injunction sought and refused - applicants sought to restrain non-party to proceedings in Supreme Court between applicants and non-party's ex-husband - Mareva relief sought against non-party on basis that ex-husband insolvent, likely to be bankrupted for non-payment of judgment applicants expected to obtain in Supreme Court proceedings and part proceeds of sale of house would be recoverable from non-party by ex-husband's trustee in bankruptcy - application refused Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 43(1)(b) and s 121 Cardile v Led Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 73 ALJR 657 cited Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612 referred to Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 referred to Re Taylor; Ex parte Natwest Australia Bank Ltd (1992) 37 FCR 194 referred to Bullock v The Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (1985) 5 FCR 464 referred to JIANN-SHAN CHIOU AND TE-WAN HONG v HUANG MA-LI WANG Q 28 OF 2000 DRUMMOND J 29 MAY 2000 SYDNEY (HEARD IN BRISBANE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 28 OF 2000
BETWEEN: JIANN-SHAN CHIOU
FIRST APPLICANT
TE-WAN HONG
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: HUANG MA-LI WANG
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DRUMMOND J
DATE OF ORDER: 29 MAY 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN BRISBANE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be refused.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 28 OF 2000
BETWEEN: JIANN-SHAN CHIOU
FIRST APPLICANT
TE-WAN HONG
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: HUANG MA-LI WANG
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DRUMMOND J
DATE: 29 MAY 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate