Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brooks v Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 721
INCOME TAX – capital gains – contract for sale and purchase of land – purchaser defaults and vendor rescinds contract and forfeits deposit paid under contract – whether forfeited deposit to be taken into account in calculating a net capital gain to be included in the assessable income of the vendor – whether forfeiture of deposit a disposal of an asset within ss 160M(3), 160M(6) or 160M(7) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – whether purchaser a "prospective purchaser" so that s 160ZZC(12) applied to the forfeiting of the deposit – whether previous decision of a differently constituted Full Court plainly wrong and should not be followed – special case referred by Administrative Appeals Tribunal to Court for determination of questions of law answered. WORDS AND PHRASES: "prospective purchaser" Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 160M(3), 160M(6), 160M(7), 160MA(2), 160ZZC(3), 160ZZC(12), 160ZZQ(12) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 104-150 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Guy (1996) 67 FCR 68 not followed Transurban City Link Ltd v Allan (1999) 168 ALR 687 referred to Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Orica Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 500 discussed Commissioner of Taxation v Skully (2000) 74 ALJR 504 referred to Archibald Howie Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1948) 77 CLR 143 cited CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384 cited Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297 cited Sorrell v Finch [1977] AC 728 discussed Chillingworth v Esche [1924] 1 Ch 97 discussed Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 discussed Wright v Newton (1835) 2 Cr M & R 124, 150 ER 53 discussed Henderson v Young (1912) 15 WALR 5 discussed Richards v Hill [1920] NZLR 724 discussed Whinfield v Lovell [1926] VLR 185 discussed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate