Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Connors v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 783
JOHN WILLIAM THOMAS CONNORS v REPATRIATION COMMISSION V 380 of 1998 KENNY J MELBOURNE 13 JUNE 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 380 OF 1998
BETWEEN: JOHN WILLIAM THOMAS CONNORS
Applicant
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGE: KENNY J
DATE: 13 JUNE 2000
PLACE: MELBOURNE
CORRIGENDA 1. In paragraph 19, line 7 of the Reasons for Judgment of Justice Kenny handed down on 13 June 2000, replace reference to "Commission" and insert "respondent". AMANDA FOLEY Associate to Justice Kenny
13 June 2000
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Connors v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 783
VETERANS AFFAIRS – War-caused injury or disease – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether veteran's condition of lumbar spondylosis was war-caused – whether Statement of Principles upholds a hypothesis connecting veteran's disease with service where the material does not raise or point to an essential factor.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, s 44(1) Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, s 9, s 13, s 119, s 120, s 120A, s 196B(3) Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82 applied Deledio v Repatriation Commission (1997) 25 AAR 396 referred Repatriation Commission v O'Brien (1985) 155 CLR 422 referred East v Repatriation Commission (1987) 16 FCR 517 applied Repatriation Commission v Bey (1997) 79 FCR 364 discussed Bushell v Repatriation Commission (1992) 175 CLR 408 discussed Repatriation Commission v McKenna (1998) 28 AAR 7 referred McKenna v Repatriation Commission v McKenna (1999) 86 FCR 144 applied Repatriation Commission v Gosewinckel [1999] FCA 1273 followed Byrnes v Repatriation Commission (1993) 177 CLR 564 discussed Repatriation Commission v Stares (1996) 66 FCR 594 referred Shelton v Repatriation Commission (1999) 85 FCR 587 referred
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate