Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CPSU, The Community and Public Sector Union v State of Victoria
[2000] FCA 786
INDUSTRIAL LAW – whether respondent in contravention of s298K of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) – whether threat alleged to have been made by respondent was, on the balance of probabilities, actually made – onus of applicants to prove alleged conduct – whether onus of proof satisfied Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s298K
Community and Public Sector Union v State of Victoria [2000] FCA 759 referred to
CPSU, The Community and Public Sector Union v State of Victoria [2000] FCA 14 referred to
CPSU, The Community & Public Sector Union v Crown in Right of the State of Victoria [1999] FCA 948 referred to
Maritime Union of Australia v Geraldton Port Authority [1999] FCA 899; (1999) 93 FCR 34 followed
Jones v Thiess Bros Pty Ltd (1977) 30 FLR 422 followed
Cuevas v Freeman Motors Ltd (1975) 25 FLR 67 followed
CPSU, THE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC SECTOR UNION & ORS v STATE OF VICTORIA V 107 of 1999 MARSHALL J MELBOURNE 22 JUNE 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 107 of 1999
BETWEEN: CPSU, THE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC SECTOR UNION
FIRST APPLICANT
ROBERT MURRELL
SECOND APPLICANT
DARREN JOHN HUTCHINS
THIRD APPLICANT
AND: STATE OF VICTORIA
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 JUNE 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application, insofar as it concerns the issue raised at par 42 of the amended statement of claim, be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 107 of 1999
BETWEEN: CPSU, THE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC SECTOR UNION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate