Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Workers' Union v BHP Iron-Ore Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 799
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay – stay sought of injunction – appeal to single judge from single judge – judge at first instance refused to grant stay – whether stay would render ultimate appeal nugatory – factors to consider in granting stay. Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth): s 170MO Federal Court Rules: O 52 r17 AUSTRALIAN WORKERS' UNION & ORS v BHP IRON-ORE PTY LTD V 24 of 2000 GOLDBERG J 6 JUNE 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 24 of 2000
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN WORKERS' UNION
First Applicant
CONSTRUCTION FORESTRY MINING & ENERGY UNION
Second Applicant
AUTOMOTIVE FOOD METALS ENGINEERING PRINTING & KINDRED INDUSTRIES UNION
Third Applicant
COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL PLUMBING & ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA
Fourth Applicant
TRANSPORT WORKERS' UNION OF AUSTRALIA
Fifth Applicant
DOUGLAS STEAD
Sixth Applicant
ROSS KOMEROA
Seventh Applicant
IAN BURTENSHAW
Eighth Applicant
PHILLIP ROONEY
Ninth Applicant
ROSS BEGGS
Tenth Applicant
AND: BHP IRON-ORE PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 6 JUNE 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application by the applicant that there be a stay of the order of Ryan J made on 6 June 2000 is refused. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate