Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services v Rolley [2000] FCA 806
SOCIAL SECURITY - appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – pension – income earned from casual employment – whether income free area limit exceeded – calculation of income – distinction between annual amount and annual rate of income – question of fact – character of income received.
Social Security Act 1991 (Cth)
Harris v Director-General of Social Security (1985) 57 ALR 729 discussed, followed Haldane-Stevenson v Director-General of Social Security (1985) 60 ALR 621 cited SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES v JANET ROLLEY Q3 OF 2000 FRENCH, KIEFEL AND DOWSETT JJ 20 JUNE 2000 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q3 OF 2000
On appeal from the General Administrative Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal constituted by Ms S A Forgie (Deputy President)
BETWEEN: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
APPLICANT
AND: JANET ROLLEY
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH, KIEFEL AND DOWSETT JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 20 JUNE 2000
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. There will be no order as to costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q3 OF 2000
On appeal from the General Administrative Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal constituted by Ms S A Forgie (Deputy President)
BETWEEN: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
APPLICANT
AND: JANET ROLLEY
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH, KIEFEL AND DOWSETT JJ
DATE: 20 JUNE 2000
PLACE: BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The Court:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate