Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cohen v Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 833
INCOME TAX – employee of insurance company paid by way of fortnightly advance debited to an account and commissions due to him were to be credited to that account. No debit balance was repayable – whether fortnightly payments income when received – whether provisions of Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (Cth)operated to exclude advance payments as income because any negative balance in the account was written off when employment ceased – whether Tribunal erred in remitting penalty where reasons do not disclose under what section the penalty arose. Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 51(1) Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (Cth), s 14 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Steeves Agnew & Co (Vic) Pty Ltd (1951) 82 CLR 408 distinguished Australian Mutual Provident Society v Allan (1978) 52 ALJR 407 cited Arthur Murray (NSW) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1965) 114 CLR 314 discussed Jagelman v Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 95 ATC 4055 cited
PHILLIP LAWRENCE COHEN v
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
N 1505 of 1999 HILL J 5 JULY 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1505 OF 1999
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: PHILLIP LAWRENCE COHEN
APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 5 JULY 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be allowed in part. 2. The orders of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal be set aside so far as they concerned the remission of penalty tax to 10% of the tax payable on the amount of $23,185. 3. The matter be remitted to the Tribunal to consider in accordance with law whether additional tax, if any, should be assessed under ss 226G, 226H or 226K of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) and, if so, whether the whole or any part thereof should be remitted. 4. There be no order as to costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate