Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Harris v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 873 VETERANS' AFFAIRS - appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("the Tribunal") affirming that the appellant's condition of lumbar spondylosis was not war-caused - application of Statement of Principles defining "trauma to the lumbar spine" - whether Tribunal correctly applied the third stage of Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82 - assumed facts - whether "acute signs and symptoms of … altered mobility … " could have been assumed by the Tribunal based upon the material before it. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - error of law detected in the decision of the Tribunal - whether it would be futile to remit the matter for redetermination. Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44, s 44(2A), s 44(4) Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), s 120(1), s 120(3), s 120A, s 120A(3), s 196B Repatriation Commission v Keeley [2000] FCA 532 referred Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 applied Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82 discussed Repatriation Commission v Stares (1996) 66 FCR 594 distinguished Critch v Repatriation Commission (1996) 43 ALD 574 distinguished Deledio v Repatriation Commission (1997) 47 ALD 261 approved Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Gungor (1982) 63 FLR 441 referred Commissioner of Taxation v Polla-Mounter (FCA, 30 November 1995, unreported) applied Morales v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 60 FCR 550 referred
TERRENCE JOHN HARRIS v REPATRIATION COMMISSION
VG 157 of 1999 FINN J 4 JULY 2000 SYDNEY (HEARD IN MELBOURNE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 157 OF 1999
BETWEEN: TERRENCE JOHN HARRIS
APPLICANT
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate