Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
National Tertiary Education Industry Union v University of Technology, Sydney [2000] FCA 874 INDUSTRIAL LAW – NTEU excluded from negotiations between CPSU and University regarding the certification of a new enterprise agreement – claim of discrimination INJUNCTIONS – interlocutory orders sought restraining the University from entering into agreement – balance of convenience against intervention – serious question to be tried but not a strong case – Act seeks to prevent discrimination against employees, but not against industrial organisations themselves – Commission prohibited from certifying a discriminatory agreement – Commission able to determine factual questions – delay of pay rise Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), ss 170NB(1), 298M In the matter of CSL Enterprise Agreement 1999; CSL Limited v CPSU (Full Bench of Industrial Relations Commission, 5 June 2000), considered NATIONAL TERTIARY EDUCATION INDUSTRY UNION v UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY N 581 of 2000
MADGWICK J 7 JUNE 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 581 of 2000
BETWEEN: NATIONAL TERTIARY EDUCATION INDUSTRY UNION
APPLICANT
AND: UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY
RESPONDENT
AND: COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC SECTOR UNION
INTERVENER JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 JUNE 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for interlocutory relief is dismissed. 2. The applicant is to pay the costs of the respondent and intervenor. 3. The applicant is granted liberty to apply to the Court on short notice in relation to express entitlements of its members, as explained in the reasons for decision.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 581 of 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate