Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
V Rent Pty Limited v Video Ezy International Pty Limited [2000] FCA 879 PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – transfer of proceedings to the District Court of New South Wales pursuant to s 86A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – delay by applicants in prosecuting the proceedings – whether "in the interests of justice" to order transfer Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 86A
Wall v SBA Foods Pty Limited [1999] FCA 1831 followed
V RENT PTY LIMITED (ACN 082 609 201), IAN MURRAY BOSWELL AND BRUCE STEVENSON BISSETT v VIDEO EZY INTERNATIONAL PTY LIMITED (ACN 003 532 269), PETER JOHN CONRIDGE, KERIN ELIZABETH HARRINGTON, GAYLE HARRINGTON, BRONWYN HOOPER-DOAK, JEFFREY RONALD HARRINGTON & KEITH WILLIAM WHITTAKER, JOHN OGILVIE AND FOBOPO PTY LIMITED (ACN 003 551 335) N 808 OF 1999
MOORE J 30 JUNE 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 808 OF 1999
BETWEEN: V RENT PTY LIMITED (ACN 082 609 201)
FIRST APPLICANT
IAN MURRAY BOSWELL
SECOND APPLICANT
BRUCE STEVENSON BISSETT
THIRD APPLICANT
AND: VIDEO EZY INTERNATIONAL PTY LIMITED
(ACN 003 532 269)
FIRST RESPONDENT
PETER JOHN CONRIDGE
SECOND RESPONDENT
KERIN ELIZABETH HARRINGTON, GAYLE HARRINGTON, BRONWYN HOOPER-DOAK, JEFFREY RONALD HARRINGTON & KEITH WILLIAM WHITTAKER
THIRD RESPONDENT
JOHN OGILVIE
FOURTH RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate