Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ozzy Tyre & Tube Pty Ltd v Chief Executive Officer of Customs [2000] FCA 891
SEARCH WARRANTS – warrant framed as "three condition" warrant is not for that reason invalid – whether the third condition failed to sufficiently limit the warrant because it was unlimited as to time and manner of breach – whether a condition which "rolls-up" allegations of more than one offence invalidates the warrant – there is no requirement that each offence must be stated in a separate paragraph - whether use of the phrase "systematic breach" provided any practical limitation to the scope of search – a search warrant is required to disclose the offence in question so as to indicate the area of the search – the statement of the offence in a warrant need not be made with the precision of an indictment – lack of reference to the mental element of the offence does not invalidate the warrant where the section number and statute prescribing the offence has been stated – a warrant must be considered as a whole – sufficiency is determined from the standpoint of the ordinary person reading the warrant WORDS AND PHRASES – evidential material Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 3(1)(b), 3C(1), 3E Customs Act 1901 (Cth) ss 183UA, 198, 198(3), 198(3)(a), 233(1)(a), 234(1)(a), 234(1)(d), 234(1)(d)(i) Dunesky v Elder (1994) 54 FCR 540 cited Grollo v Macauley (1995) 56 FCR 533 cited Harts Australia Ltd v Commissioner, Australian Federal Police (1997) 75 FCR 145 applied Malubel Pty Ltd v Elder (1998) 88 FCR 242 referred to George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 applied Beneficial Finance Corporation v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (1991) 31 FCR 523 applied Ousley v The Queen (1997) 192 CLR 69 applied Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Cloran (1984) 4 FCR 151 distinguished Brewer v Castles (1984) 1 FCR 55; Brewer v Castles (No 2) (1984) 52 ALR 577 cited Commonwealth of Australia v Northern Land Council (1991) 30 FCR 1 referred to The Compagnie Financiere et Commerciale du Pacifique v The Peruvian Guano Co (1882) 11 QBD 55 cited Cosco Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1997) 37 ATR 432 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate