Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mohsen Soltanyzand v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 917
MIGRATION – REFUGEES – application for review of decision that the applicant was not a person to whom Australia owed protection obligations – whether the interpreting service provided at the Tribunal hearing was inadequate resulting in a reviewable procedural error – whether there was a relevant departure from the required standard of interpretation – whether actual bias on Tribunal's part. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Dabare v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 731, cited Geng v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1999) 93 FCR 556, referred to Ismail v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1555, applied Kahn v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1998) 57 ALD 371, cited Khelifi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 791, cited Khogali v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1076, cited Perera v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1999) 92 FCR 6, applied Phan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 171 ALR 323, cited Sun Zhan Qui v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1997) 151 ALR 505 , applied Zaltni v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 399, referred to Zoeller v Federal Republic of Germany (1989) 23 FCR 282, referred to MOHSEN SOLTANYZAND V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W 166 OF 1999 CARR J 12 JULY 2000 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 166 OF 1999
BETWEEN: MOHSEN SOLTANYZAND
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: CARR J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate