Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Yarmirr v The Northern Territory of Australia [2000] FCA 945
Matter No. DG6006 of 1998 MARY YARMIRR & OTHERS v THE NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA & OTHERS BEAUMONT, von DOUSSA & MERKEL JJ 13 JULY 2000 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY DG6006 OF 1998
BETWEEN: MARY YARMIRR AND OTHERS
Appellants
AND: THE NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent
PASPALEY PEARLS
Third Respondent
FISHING INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC
Fourth Respondent
OCEAN TRAWLER PTY LTD
Fifth Respondent
SHINE FISHERIES PTY LTD
Sixth Respondent
MCKAILIS GULF FISHERIES PTY LTD
Seventh Respondent
MS PAVALINA HENWOOD
Eighth Respondent
ARNHEM LAND ABORIGINAL LAND TRUST
Ninth Respondent
JUDGE: BEAUMONT, von DOUSSA & MERKEL JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 13 JULY 2000
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. On the Notice of Motion filed by the appellants on 22 December 1999 there be no order as to costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY DG6006 OF 1998
BETWEEN: MARY YARMIRR AND OTHERS
Appellants
AND: THE NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent
PASPALEY PEARLS
Third Respondent
FISHING INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC
Fourth Respondent
OCEAN TRAWLER PTY LTD
Fifth Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate