Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jansz v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 958
MIGRATION – refugees – whether decision of Refugee Review Tribunal complied with s 430(1) - whether Tribunal erred in law in its construction of "persecution" Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 as amended by Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees 1967 – Art 1A(2) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 430(1) JAN RALSTON JANSZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS - V 721 of 1999 RUSSEL MAXWELL JANSZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS – V 722 of 1999 BRIAN MAXWELL JANSZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS – V 723 of 1999 JUDGE: MERKEL J PLACE: MELBOURNE DATE: 17 JULY 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 721, 722 and 723 of 1999
BETWEEN: JAN RALSTON JANSZ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT AND BETWEEN: RUSSEL MAXWELL JANSZ APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS RESPONDENT
AND BETWEEN: BRIAN MAXWELL JANSZ APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MERKEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 JULY 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
The Court orders that each of the applications be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 721, 722 and 723 of 1999
BETWEEN: JAN RALSTON JANSZ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT AND BETWEEN: RUSSEL MAXWELL JANSZ APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate