Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control Technologies Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 980
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – patent – construction of claims – effect of amendment – 'pith and marrow' – purposive construction – skilled addressee – infringement – want of novelty – obviousness – manner of new manufacture – fair basing TORTS – procuring interference with patentee's rights – intentional tort – personal liability of director for company's wrongdoing WORDS AND PHRASES – "strip", "for"
Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 7(2), 7(3), 18(1), 40(3), 116, 138(3)(b), 234(5), Schedule 1 Patents Act 1952 (Cth) ss 35(1)(a), 40(2), 100(1)(c), 100(1)(d), 100(1)(e), 100(1)(g) ADGA Systems International Ltd v Valcom Ltd (1999) 39 CCEL (2d) 163 cited American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd [1979] RPC 215 cited Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Australian Federation of Air Pilots [1991] 1 VR 637 referred to Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Australian Federation of Air Pilots (No 2) [1991] 2 VR 636 cited Arnold v Bradbury (1871) 6 ChApp 706 referred to Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd v Valamo Pty Ltd (1990) 18 IPR 216 cited Autocaps (Aust) Pty Ltd v Pro-Kit Pty Ltd (1999) 46 IPR 339 cited Banfield v Johnson (1994) 7 NZCLC 260,496 cited Beecham Canada Ltd v Procter & Gamble Co (1982) 61 CPR (2d) 1 cited Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v FH Faulding & Co Ltd (2000) 46 IPR 553 followed British Ore Concentration Syndicate Ltd v Minerals Separation Ltd (1909) 26 RPC 124 referred to Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183 applied CBS Inc v Ames Records and Tapes Limited [1982] Ch 91 cited C Evans & Sons Ltd v Spritebrand Ltd [1985] 1 WLR 317 not followed Clark v Adie (1875) 10 ChApp 667 referred to Commissioner of Patents v Microcell Ltd (1959) 102 CLR 232 cited Conoco Specialty Products (Inc) v Merpro Montassa Ltd [1994] FSR 99 referred to Cropper v Smith (1884) 26 Ch D 700 followed C Van Der Lely NV v Bamfords Ltd [1963] RPC 61 referred to D C Thomson & Co Ltd v Deakin [1952] Ch 646 referred to Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1988) 13 IPR 385 referred to Electric & Musical Industries Ltd v Lissen Ltd (1939) 56 RPC 23 cited Electricity Trust of South Australia v Zellweger Uster Pty Ltd (1986) 7 IPR 491 cited Emerald Construction Co Ltd v Lowthian [1966] 1 WLR 691 cited Falcon v Famous Players Film Co [1926] 2 KB 474 cited Fightvision Pty Ltd v Onisforou (1999) 47 NSWLR 473 applied Flour Oxidizing Company Ltd v Carr & Co Ltd (1908) 25 RPC 428 referred to Genentech Inc v The Wellcome Foundation Ltd (1989) 15 IPR 423 cited The General Tire & Rubber Company v The Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company Ltd [1972] RPC 457 discussed Golden v Anderson (1967) 64 Cal Rptr 404 Graham Hart (1971) Pty Ltd v S W Hart & Company Pty Ltd (1978) 141 CLR 305 referred to Greig v Insole [1978] 1 WLR 302 cited Hill v Evans (1862) 4 de G F & J 288; 45 ER 1195 referred to Hirsh Co v Minshall (1988) 89 NR 136, 22 CPR (3d) 268 cited Hirsh Co v Spacemaker Ltd (1987) 17 CPR (3d) 89 cited Hoover plc v George Hulme (Stockport) Ltd (1982) FSR 565 cited Imperial Oil Ltd v C & G Holdings Ltd 62 DLR (4th) 261 referred to Improver Corporation v Remington Consumer Products Ltd [1990] FSR 181 applied Innovative Agricultural Products Pty Ltd v Crawshaw (unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Lee J, 19 August 1996) cited International Standard Electric Corporation v Ooms 157 F2d 73 (1946) cited J K Smit & Sons Inc v McClintock [1940] SCR 279 cited J T Stratford & Son Ltd v Lindley [1965] AC 269 cited James v The Commonwealth (1939) 62 CLR 339 referred to Jasperson v Dominion Tobacco Company [1923] AC 709 referred to Kalamazoo (Aust) Pty Ltd v Compact Business Systems Pty Ltd (1985) 5 IPR 213 cited Katun Corp v Technofax Inc (1988) 22 CPR (3d) 269 cited King v Millpurrurru (1996) 136 ALR 327 referred to Kyowa's Application [1968] RPC 101 cited Leonardis v Sartas No 1 Pty Ltd (1996) 67 FCR 126 at 146 cited Lumley v Gye (1853) 2 El&Bl 216; 118 ER 749 discussed Martin and Biro Swan Ltd v H Millwood Ltd [1956] RPC 125 referred to Martin Engineering Co v Nicaro Holdings Pty Ltd (1991) 100 ALR 358 cited Mentmore Manufacturing Co Ltd v National Merchandising Manufacturing Co Inc (1978) 89 DLR (3d) 195 referred to Meyers Taylor Pty Ltd v Vicarr Industries Ltd (1977) 137 CLR 228 referred to Microsoft Corporation v Auschina Polaris Pty Ltd (1996) 71 FCR 231 cited Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd (1980) 144 CLR 253 cited Moorhouse v University of New South Wales [1976] RPC 151 cited Nesbit Evans Group Australia Pty Ltd v Impro Ltd (1997) 39 IPR 56 referred to Non-Drip Measure Co Ltd v Stranger's Ltd (1943) 60 RPC 135 cited Northern Territory of Australia v Mengel (1995) 185 CLR 307 referred to NV Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken v Mirabella International Pty Ltd (1993) 44 FCR 239 referred to O'Brien v Dawson (1942) 66 CLR 18 discussed Olin Corporation v Super Cartridge Co Pty Ltd (1977) 180 CLR 236 referred to Osram Lamps v Pope Electric Lamp Co (1917) 34 RPC 369 cited Plimpton v Malcolmson (1876) 3 ChD 531 referred to Pope Appliance Corporation v Spanish River Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd (1929) 46 RPC 23 cited Populin v HB Nominees Pty Ltd and Binder (1982) 41 ALR 471 referred to Performing Right Society Ltd v Ciryl Theatrical Syndicate Ltd [1924] 1 KB 1 not followed Quinn v Leathem [1901] AC 495 referred to Radiation Ltd v Galliers & Klaerr Pty Ltd [1938] 60 CLR 36 referred to The Raleigh Cycle Co Ltd v H Miller & Co Ltd (1946) 63 RPC 113 cited The Raleigh Cycle Co Ltd v H Miller & Co Ltd (1948) 65RPC 141 referred to RCA Corporation v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1982] RPC 91 cited Ridgeway Maritime Inc v Beulah Wings Ltd and Dr Tunji Braithwaite ('The Leon') [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep 611 cited Rodi and Wienenberger AG v Henry Showell Ltd [1969] RPC 367 referred to Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 referred to Rosedale Associated Manufacturers Ltd v Carlton Tyre Saving Co Ltd [1960] RPC 59 cited Rotocrop International Ltd v Genbourne Ltd [1982] FSR 241 cited Rutherford v Poole [1953] VLR 130 discussed Said v Butt [1920] 3 KB 497 followed Sami S Svendsen Inc v Independent Products Canada Ltd (1968) 119 CLR 156 referred to Sanders v Snell (1998) 196 CLR 329 cited Sharpe & Dohme Inc v Boots Pure Drug Co Ltd (1928) 45 RPC 153 applied Short v The City Bank of Sydney (1912) 15 CLR 148 applied Société Technique de Pulverisation Step v Emson Europe Ltd [1993] RPC 513 cited Tetra Molectric Ltd v Japan Imports Ltd [1976] RPC 547 referred to TNT Canada Inc v Kwik Transfer Inc (1987) 18 CPR (3d) 51 cited Trevor Ivory Ltd v Anderson [1992] 2 NZLR 517 referred to Tsaprazis v Goldcrest Properties Pty Ltd (2000) 18 ACLC 285 discussed Underwriters' Survey Bureau Ltd v Massie & Renwick Ltd [1938] Ex CR 103 affirmed [1940] SCR 218 cited Vidal Dyes Syndicate Ltd v Levinstein Ltd and Read Holliday & Sons Ltd (1912) 29 RPC 245 referred to Vigneux v Canadian Performing Right Society (1943) 4 Fox Pat C 183 cited Visa International Service Association v Visa Motel Corp (1984) 1 CPR (3d) 109 cited Wah Tat Bank Ltd v Chan Cheng Kum [1975] AC 507 not followed Walker v Alemite Corporation (1933) 49 CLR 643 distinguished The Wellcome Foundation Ltd v V R Laboratories (Aust) Pty Ltd (1981) 148 CLR 262 cited White Horse Distillers Ltd v Gregson Associates Ltd [1984] RPC 61 referred to Windsurfing International Inc v Novacttion Sports Inc (1987) 18 CPR (3d) 230 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate