Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ramirez v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1000
MIGRATION – Refugee application – Review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – appellant claimed that he feared persecution for reason of his imputed political opinion – whether the Tribunal erred in law in its finding that the appellant's resistance to criminality could not be construed as a political opinion – whether the Tribunal erred in not considering whether the appellant's whole local community was being persecuted because it sought the protection of the army - whether the Tribunal erred in not considering whether the alleged persecution had more than one motivation. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 430, 476
Li Wen Han v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 421 referred to Kundu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 560 referred to Yilmaz v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 906 referred to Nader v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 908 referred to V v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 92 FCR 355 followed Sarrazola v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 166 ALR 641 followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845 followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Y (Davies J, 15 May 1998, unreported) followed Canada (Attorney-General) v Ward (1993) 103 DLR (4th) 1 approved GERMAN DARIO AGUDELO RAMIREZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTRUAL AFFAIRS N 94 OF 2000 HILL, MATHEWS & LINDGREN JJ 2 AUGUST 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 94 OF 2000
On appeal from a judge of the Court
BETWEEN: GERMAN DARIO AGUDELO RAMIREZ
APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate