Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Secretary, Department of Employment, Education, Training & Youth Affairs v Fitzalan [2000] FCA 1061
SOCIAL SECURITY ) EMPLOYMENT ) – newstart allowance and case management system – Case Management Activity Agreement – relationship between s 45(5) and s 45(6) of the Employment Services Act 1994 – whether a person who has failed the test of s 45(6) can still succeed under the general provision of s 45(5)(b) – discussion of conflicting authority on this point – whether an agreement expressed by the words "I will do everything I can to get a job" is valid or void for uncertainty – whether work was "unsuitable" in the particular circumstances because it involved staying away from home four nights in the week during a period of three to four months and also some overtime – discussion of the meaning of "unsuitable" having regard to the objects of the legislation and of the Case Management Activity Agreement – circumstances in which a person might satisfy s 45(5)(b) though not satisfying s 45(6) – whether it was open to the AAT to conclude that the unemployed person had satisfied s 45(6) or s 45(5)(b) – circumstances in which it was "appropriate" within s 44(4) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act to set aside the Tribunal's decision without referring it back for reconsideration and to substitute the appropriate decision. Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44(1), (3), (4) Employment Services Act 1994 (Cth), ss 37(1), 39(1), 42, 45(5)(b), 45(6) Secretary, Department of Employment, Education and Youth Affairs v Ferguson (1997) 76 FCR 426 followed Secretary, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs v Messenger (1997) 48 ALD 26 followed Walsh v Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs (1998) 51 ALD 690 followed Garnys v Secretary, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs (1999) 164 ALR 319 discussed, in part not followed Secretary, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs v Baker (1997) 48 ALD 33 followed Upper Hunter County District Council v Australian Chilling and Freezing Co Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 429 applied Meehan v Jones (1982) 149 CLR 571 applied Trawl Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Effem Foods Pty Ltd (1992) 27 NSWLR 326 applied SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION, TRAINING AND YOUTH AFFAIRS v BARRY JAMES FITZALAN NG 996 of 1997 BURCHETT J 4 AUGUST 2000 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate