Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ogenic Ltd v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu ( No 2) [2000] FCA 1074
OGENIC LTD v DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU AND OTHERS WAG 3009 of 1997 FRENCH J 16 JUNE 2000 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WG3009 OF 1997
BETWEEN: OGENIC LIMITED (ACN 009 205 805)
Applicant
AND: DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
AND: First Respondent
AND: POUL ANKER KIRKEBJERG
AND: Second Respondent
AND: IMODAN PTY LTD (ACN 009 295 158)
AND: Third Respondent
STANTON PARTNERS (A PARTNERSHIP)
Fourth Respondent
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
Cross-Claimant in First Cross-Claim
OGENIC LIMITED (ACN 009 205 805)
Cross-Respondent in First Cross-Claim
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
Cross-Claimant in Second Cross-Claim
STANTON PARTNERS (A PARTNERSHIP)
First Cross-Respondent in Second Cross-Claim
JP VAN DIEREN, NB GRAHAM, ADB GRAHAM,
G KELLY, J SHERVINGTON
Second Cross-Respondents in Second Cross-Claim
ABD GRAHAM, ER PEDLOW, DFG GRAHAM,
NDB GRAHAM
Third Cross-Respondents in Second Cross-Claim
PN NICHOLLS, GL KELLY, C PAPADOPOULOS
Fourth Cross-Respondents in Second Cross-Claim
PETER FARR CONSULTANTS AUSTRALIASIA
PTY LTD (ACN 051 294 583)
Fifth Cross-Respondent in Second Cross-Claim
STANTON PARTNERS (A PARTNERSHIP)
Cross-Claimant in Third Cross-Claim
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
First Cross-Respondent in Third Cross-Claim
PN NICHOLLS, GL KELLY, C PAPADOPOULOS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate