Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Jang [2000] FCA 1075 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Migration – Application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – Chinese national claimed to fear persecution on account of religion – Applicant is committed Christian who engaged in "house-church" worship and proselytising in Jilin Province, China – Under Chinese national law, religious activities are unlawful except for worship in a registered church – Country evidence indicated the degree of enforcement of this law varies from region to region, depending on attitude of local officials – Law strictly enforced in Jilin – Tribunal accepted applicant had suffered persecution on account of her religious activities and reasonably feared persecution if returned to China – Refugee status acknowledged – Appeal by Minister contending Tribunal erred in law in failing to consider whether applicant could relocate elsewhere in China – Consideration of the relocation principle in respect of feared persecution arising from enforcement of a national law. Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 discussed Migration Act 1958, Part 8 Division 2
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS v KEUM E JANG
N1370 of 1999 WILCOX J SYDNEY 4 AUGUST 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1370 of 1999
BETWEEN: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Applicant
AND: KEUM E JANG
Respondent
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 4 AUGUST 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, pay the costs of the respondent, Keum E Jang. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate