Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Martinez v Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services [2000] FCA 1090 SOCIAL SECURITY – compensation recovery – applicant in receipt of a series of periodic compensation payments and compensation affected payments – wife also in receipt of compensation affected payments – notice to insurer to reduce compensation payment - AAT affirming decision of Social Security Appeals Tribunal affirming decision of Authorised Review Officer to seek recovery – whether AAT in error of law in understanding of "special circumstances" – whether AAT in error of law in application of "special circumstances" to the applicant's presently obtaining circumstances – relevance of applicant's prior history
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44(1) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), ss 1170, 1184 Kertland v Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services (1999) 30 AAR 411, considered Re Beadle v Director-General of Social Security (1984) 6 ALD 1, cited Haidar v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1998) 157 ALR 359, followed Secretary, Department of Social Security v Smith (1991) 30 FCR 556, cited Beadle v Director-General of Social Security (1985) 60 ALR 225, applied Groth v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1995) 40 ALD 541, followed Secretary, Department of Social Security v Ellis (1997) 46 ALD 1, followed JESUS MARTINEZ v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES W 156 of 1999
R D NICHOLSON J 11 AUGUST 2000
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 156 of 1999
BETWEEN: JESUS MARTINEZ
Applicant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES
Respondent
JUDGE: R D NICHOLSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 AUGUST 2000
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application by way of appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate