Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Yaqub v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1092
MIGRATION – Refugee application – Review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – whether the Tribunal failed to give adequate reasons under s 430(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – the Tribunal failed to give reasons for not accepting evidence – whether the Tribunal erred in making findings that were not open to it on the evidence before it – whether the decision of the Tribunal was induced by actual bias.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 430(1) and 476(1)
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845 followed N258/00A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 993 followed Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 followed Rahman v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 72 referred to Singh v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (Lockhart J, 18 October 1996, unreported) followed
IRFAN YAQUB v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1142 of 1999 MATHEWS J SYDNEY 9 AUGUST 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1142 OF 1999
BETWEEN: IRFAN YAQUB
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MATHEWS J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 AUGUST 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1142 OF 1999
BETWEEN: IRFAN YAQUB
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MATHEWS J
DATE: 9 AUGUST 2000
PLACE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate