Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1096 MING CHEN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 401 OF 2000 MOORE J 2 AUGUST 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 401 OF 2000
BETWEEN: MING CHEN
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 2 AUGUST 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 401 OF 2000
BETWEEN: MING CHEN
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE: 2 AUGUST 2000
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal. The applicant appeared in person at the directions hearing on 8 June 2000 when directions were given, by consent, including an order fixing the matter for hearing at 9.00am today. The matter has been called and there is no appearance for the applicant. I am satisfied that the applicant was made aware at the directions hearing on 8 June 2000 of the hearing date and plainly enough, its significance to the applicant can be assumed. 2 In view of the fact that there is no appearance, I propose under O 32 r 2 to dismiss the application. I so order. In addition I order that the applicant pay the respondent Minister's costs of the application. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate