Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland [2000] FCA 1106 COSTS – Costs of application to amend cross‑claim – no longer any issue of liability of respondents to applicant – substantive issues resolved – no judgment on applications on substantive issues – resolution of costs of application by reference to substantive issues although no judgment given on substantive issues. PLEADINGS – Cross-claim – application to amend cross-claim – claim that amendment would cause irreparable prejudice – prejudice alleged on basis of length of time between initial hearing and proposed hearing of amended cross-claim – no irreparable prejudice. DAMAGES – Damages on cross-claim - application to amend cross-claim – application based on claim for contribution – contribution claim based on Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) and on equity – claim based on statute inapplicable on facts – claim based on equity failed because of lack of co-ordinate liability or common burden. ESTOPPEL – Issue estoppel – application to amend cross-claim – challenge to amendment of cross‑claim based on existence of issue estoppel – determination of ultimate fact and evidentiary fact – whether duty of care owed by solicitor to client same as duty owed by counsel to client – no identity of issues. ESTOPPEL – Anshun estoppel – application to amend cross-claim – whether amendment of cross‑claim would create an inconsistent judgment – no inconsistent judgment. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth): s 43 Federal Court Rules: O 13 r2(7) Story, Commentaries on Equity Jurisprudence 3rd ed 1920 Spencer Bower et al, The Doctrine of Res Judicata 3rd ed 1996 Australian Securities Commission v Aust‑Home Investments Ltd (1993) 44 FCR 194 referred to Gribbles Pathology Pty Ltd v Health Insurance Commission (1997) 80 FCR 284 referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 143 ALR 1 referred to Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 distinguished James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited v Seltsam Pty Ltd (1998) 196 CLR 53 distinguished NRMA Ltd v Morgan & Ors (No 3) (Giles J, 4 August 1999, unreported, New South Wales Supreme Court) distinguished Albion Insurance Co Ltd v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1969) 121 CLR 342 distinguished Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 followed Murphy v Abi‑Saab (1995) 37 NSWLR 280 followed Jackson v Goldsmith (1950) 81 CLR 446 referred to Linsley v Petrie [1998] 1 VR 427 followed Brunsden v Humphrey (1884) 14 QBD 141 followed Sandtara Pty Ltd v Abigroup Ltd (1997) 42 NSWLR 5 followed North West Water Ltd v Binnie & Partners [1990] 3 All ER 547 distinguished Chamberlain v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 164 CLR 502 referred to Arnold v National Westminster Bank Plc [1991] 2 AC 93 not followed O'Toole v Charles David Pty Limited (1991) 171 CLR 232 referred to YATES PROPERTY CORPORATION PTY LIMITED v JOHN BOLAND (as representative of Abbott Tout Russell Kennedy Solicitors) & ORS NG 44 of 1993 GOLDBERG J SYDNEY 9 AUGUST 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate