Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rajaratnam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[2000] FCA 1111
MIGRATION – decision of Refugee Review Tribunal refusing protection visa – decision of primary judge affirming decision of Tribunal – appellant citizen of Sri Lanka and of Tamil ethnicity – whether Tribunal erred in inferring that appellant did not have a well-founded fear of persecution in future – where that inference was based on the Tribunal's finding that the appellant had suffered only one act of persecution for reasons of his ethnicity in the past – extortion – whether Tribunal erred in finding that extortion practised on the appellant by a lieutenant in the Sri Lankan army was motivated by lieutenant's personal interest in the appellant and not the appellant's race or ethnicity – multi-faceted nature of extortion – whether Full Court should prefer another inference of fact over the primary judge's inference where both inferences equally open to primary judge – where inferences concern whether Tribunal has committed an error of law
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476(1)(e)
Sidhu v Holmes [2000] FCA 776 considered Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs v Hamsher (1992) 35 FCR 359 considered Perampalam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1999) 84 FCR 274 considered Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Sarrazola (1999) 166 ALR 641 referred to MANUEL RAJARATNAM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 27 OF 2000 MOORE, FINN AND DOWSETT JJ 10 AUGUST 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 27 OF 2000
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MANUEL RAJARATNAM
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate