Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1125
MIGRATION - judicial review under s 44(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) of a decision of the Tribunal to affirm a decision of a delegate of the Minister not to grant the appellant a protection visa - whether the appellant was excluded from the Convention definition of "refugee" by Art 1F(b) because there were serious reasons for considering that he had committed a "serious non-political crime" outside Australia prior to his arrival - factors which must be taken into account in determining whether a crime is "non-political" - whether a crime may only be characterised as "political" if the motive of the criminal is purely political - whether a crime which can be characterised as a crime of revenge is necessarily "non-political" 1951 Convention Relating To The Status of Refugees, Art 1F(b) R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, Ex Parte Cheng [1973] AC 931, referred to Prevato v Governor, Metropolitan Remand Centre (1986) 8 FCR 358, referred to Gil v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) [1994] FCJ 1559, referred to T v Home Secretary [1996] AC 742, referred to Immigration and Naturalization Service v Aguirre-Aguirre (Supreme Court of the United States, 3 May 1999, case number 97-1754), referred to Goodwin-Gill, The Refugee in International Law, 2nd ed 1996, referred to DALJIT SINGH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS S 98 OF 1999 RYAN, BRANSON AND LEHANE JJ 15 AUGUST 2000 SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 98 OF 1999
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: DALJIT SINGH
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate