Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
POS Media Online Ltd v Queensland Investment Corporation [2000] FCA 1154
POS MEDIA ONLINE LIMITED AND MALL MEDIA AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED v QUEENSLAND INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND PACIFIC ECHO PTY LIMITED AND EASTLAND PROPERTY HOLDINGS LIMITED AND WATERGARDENS PTY LIMITED AND PERPETUAL TRUSTEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED AND CANBERRA CENTRE INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED AND QIC LOGAN HYPERDOME PTY LIMITED AND JOHN CLIFFORD LONGHURST
N 803 OF 2000 LEHANE J 17 AUGUST 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 803 OF 2000
BETWEEN: POS MEDIA ONLINE LIMITED
(ACN 072 964 179)
FIRST APPLICANT
MALL MEDIA AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
(ACN 085 953 859)
SECOND APPLICANT AND: QUEENSLAND INVESTMENT CORPORATION
FIRST RESPONDENT
PACIFIC ECHO PTY LIMITED
(ACN 074 053 466)
SECOND RESPONDENT
EASTLAND PROPERTY HOLDINGS LIMITED
(ACN 055 780 295)
THIRD RESPONDENT
WATERGARDENS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 066 255 205)
FOURTH RESPONDENT
PERPETUAL TRUSTEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED
(ACN 000 431 827)
FIFTH RESPONDENT
CANBERRA CENTRE INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 067 682 893)
SIXTH RESPONDENT
QIC LOGAN HYPERDOME PTY LIMITED
(ACN 076 279 699)
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
JOHN CLIFFORD LONGHURST
EIGHTH RESPONDENT JUDGE: LEHANE J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 AUGUST 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for interlocutory relief is refused.
2. The matter be listed for directions at 9:30 am on 23 August 2000.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate