Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pioneer Electronics Australia Pty Ltd v Woodlands Resources (Aust) Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1158
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – interlocutory injunction – DVD players – trade mark infringement – application by trade mark proprietor and its Australian subsidiary – Australian subsidiary distributor of goods manufactured by Malaysian subsidiary of trade marks proprietor – respondents retailers of genuine goods manufactured by Chinese subsidiary of trade mark proprietor – safety of players – whether double-insulated – evidence obtainable by applicant from Chinese subsidiary but none proffered – inference to be drawn – alleged representation as to warranty Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 123(1) Trade Practices Act 1976 (Cth) s 52, 53(a),(aa), (c), (d), (ea), (g) and 55 Colgate-Palmolive Ltd v Markwell Finance Ltd [1989] RPC 497 mentioned Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 applied PIONEER ELECTRONICS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v WOODLANDS RESOURCES (AUST) PTY LTD V 364 OF 2000 HEEREY J 26 JULY 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 364 OF 2000
BETWEEN: PIONEER ELECTRONICS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 005 017 087) and KABUSHIKI KAISHA
APPLICANTS
AND: WOODLANDS RESOURCES (AUST) PTY LTD (ACN 084 016 053) trading as ONE STOP DVD SHOP, LEW KING NG, JONG KAN FOO, TAO HE, JIAN LI, MIN TAO LI, ZHUO MING LI, VI HUE LIEU trading as V TRONICS COMPUTERS
RESPONDENTS
JUDGE: HEEREY J
DATE OF ORDER: 26 JULY 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1) The application for an interlocutory injunction is dismissed. 2) The application for an order for substituted service is dismissed. 3) The applicants pay the respondents' costs of the application for an interlocutory injunction. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate