Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Telstra Corporation Ltd v Seven Cable Television Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1160
TRADE PRACTICES – telecommunications – promotion of competition in relation to analogue cable television services – facilitation of access under Part XIC of Trade Practices Act 1974 – specification of eligible services by Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ("ACCC") pursuant to transitional legislation – whether invalid by reference to elements purportedly specified – effect of invalidity – whether void ab initio – later declaration by ACCC of services pursuant to s 152AL of the Trade Practises Act – whether earlier specification if valid was deemed a declaration under s 152AL – whether could co-exist with later declaration of services dealing with same subject matter – whether revocation of earlier declaration necessary TRADE PRACTICES – telecommunications – declaration of listed services by ACCC pursuant to s 152AL of Trade Practices Act – ACCC required to have regard to extent declaration likely to result in achievement of objective of promotion of competition in markets for listed services – whether required to define relevant market – whether took into account irrelevant considerations or did not take into account relevant considerations – whether no evidence for findings – extent of judicial review of ACCC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – JUDICIAL REVIEW - appeal from review of administrative decision – determination by ACCC in relation to promotion of competition – relevance of expert evidence to reviewing judge – whether failure to take into account relevant considerations – alleged taking account of irrelevant considerations – alleged predetermination – alleged error of law – whether no evidence to support conclusions – whether sought impermissible review of merits ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – effect of invalidity of determination – whether void ab initio – co-existence of declarations where one is a deemed exercise of other power – whether can be later declaration if earlier declaration in existence PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – expert economic evidence – admissibility – trail judge discretion – relevance to judicial review of ACCC findings
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate