Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Takli v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1186
MIGRATION – objection to competency of application for order of review – review sought of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – application lodged later than twenty-eight days after notification of decision MIGRATION – objection to competency of application for order of review – review sought of decision of Minister under s 417 of Act – decision not judicially-reviewable MIGRATION – bridging (general) visa – review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal – whether criterion that security has been lodged, if asked for, satisfied at time of visa application – consent by Minister to setting aside of decision. WORDS & PHRASES – "at time of application"
Federal Court Rules, O 54 r 2(1), O 54A r 3(2), O 54B r 2(1), First Sch fm 56 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 5(1), 269, 417, 475(1)(b), 475(2)(e), 476, 478(1)(b), 486 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Sch 2 Subclass 050, cl 050.214 Migration Regulations 1989 (Cth), regs 34A(1), 131A(1)(g) Savouts v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1059, followed Kovalev v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 557, referred to Yong v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 54 FCR 176, applied McCarthy v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 71 FCR 204, referred to Arkan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1134, referred to RICARDO TAKLI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N700 of 2000
KATZ J SYDNEY 23 AUGUST 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N700 of 2000
BETWEEN: RICARDO TAKLI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION
& MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate