Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nizam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1199 MOHAMED HANIFFA MOHAMED NIZAM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V51 OF 2000 NORTH J 28 JULY 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 51 OF 2000
BETWEEN: MOHAMED HANIFFA MOHAMED NIZAM
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: NORTH J
DATE OF ORDER: 28 JULY 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 51 OF 2000
BETWEEN: MOHAMED HANIFFA MOHAMED NIZAM
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: NORTH J
DATE: 28 JULY 2000
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
INTRODUCTION 1 The applicant is a Muslim national of Sri Lanka, born on 24 August 1956. He and his wife and two children arrived in Australia on 23 January 1996. On 17 June 1996 he applied for the grant of a protection visa. On 18 June 1997 a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, the respondent, refused the applicant and his family the protection visas sought. On 26 June 1997 the applicant applied to the Refugee Review Tribunal (the Tribunal) for a review of the decision to refuse him and his family the protection visas. On 14 January 2000 the Tribunal determined to affirm the decision of the delegate. On 10 February 2000 the applicant applied to this Court for a review of the decision of the Tribunal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate