Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gersten v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1221 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Freedom of information – Appeals against decisions of Administrative Appeals Tribunal upholding claims for exemption from disclosure of certain documents – Documents containing confidential information received from a foreign government – Whether decision maker was required to consider the accuracy of statements made in the documents and/or the motive of the person or persons who instigated the intergovernment communication – Whether it is appropriate to apply the equitable principles concerning breach of confidence – Documents containing communications between officers of Australian Federal Police – Whether the Tribunal erred in law in holding that disclosure might have a substantial adverse effect on the conduct of the agency's operations and there was no public interest in disclosure.
Freedom of Information Act 1982, ss33(1)(b) and 40. JOSEPH GERSTEN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N795 of 1999 And JOSEPH GERSTEN v AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE N1392 of 1999 WILCOX J SYDNEY 22 AUGUST 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALESDISTRICT REGISTRY N795 of 1999
BETWEEN: JOSEPH GERSTEN
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 AUGUST 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant, Joseph Gersten, pay the costs of the respondent, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALESDISTRICT REGISTRY N1392 of 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate