Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hayle Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Technology Group Ltd [2000] FCA 1242 TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct – alleged representations during negotiations for, and after completion of, agreement for provision of venture capital – whether, but for the alleged misleading and deceptive conduct, the applicants would not have entered the agreement – whether, but for the alleged misleading and deceptive conduct, the applicants would have gone to the United States in April or November 1995 in search of alternate venture capital – whether the third applicant acted in reliance upon the representations made by the respondent – whether concealment of, or failure to disclose that a condition of the deal had not been withdrawn constitutes misleading and deceptive conduct for the purposes of s 52 DAMAGES – loss of opportunity – damages for loss of a chance - causation – whether, had the applicants gone the United States in November 1995, they could and would have obtained alternate venture capital, and established a successful business in the United States – whether the opportunity to obtain alternative venture capital has been lost, by reason of the respondent's misleading and deceptive conduct DAMAGES – damages for trading losses incurred as a result of the postponement of the decision to close down the Sydney operation Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss51A, 51A(2), 52 R v Murphy [1985] 4 NSWLR 42 referred to Watson v Foxman (Supreme Court of NSW, McLelland J, 3 August 1995, unreported) applied Christofidellis v Zdrilic [1999] FCA 39 cited Paramedical Services Pty Limited v Ambulance Service of NSW [1999] FCA 548 cited Jaldiver Pty Limited v Nelumbo Pty Limited (1993) ATPR (Digest) 46-097 cited Lam v Ausintel Investments Australia Pty Limited (1989) 97 FLR 458 applied Demagogue Pty Limited v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 applied Poseidon Limited v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1991) 105 ALR 25 referred to Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Limited (1998) 196 CLR 494 applied Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332 applied Bennett v Minister of Community Welfare (1982) 176 CLR 408 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate