Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
First Netcom Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2000] FCA 1269 EQUITY – interlocutory injunctions – undertaking as to damages – nature of – security for contingent liability under an undertaking – whether condition of injunction requiring security may be imposed retrospectively EQUITY – asset preservation orders – whether such orders may give the successful applicant priority in the event of bankruptcy or winding up WORDS & PHRASES – "usual undertaking as to damages" Federal Court Rules Os 32, 34 Telstra Corporation Ltd v First Netcom Pty Ltd (1997) 19 ATPR 41-574 referred to Telstra Corporation Ltd v First Netcom Pty Ltd (1997) 19 ATPR 41-575 referred to Air Express Ltd v Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd (1979) 146 CLR 249 considered National Australia Bank v Bond Brewing Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 271 referred to Select Personnel Pty Ltd v Morgan & Banks Pty Ltd (1988) 12 IPR 167 referred to Commodity Ocean Transport Corporation v Basford Unicorn Industries Ltd ("The Mito") [1987] 2 Lloyds Rep 197 considered Tucker v New Brunswick Trading Company of London [1880] 44 Ch D 249 considered F-Hoffman-La Roche & Co AG v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1975) AC 295 referred to Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 cited Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 612 considered FIRST NETCOM PTY LIMITED v TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED N 543 OF 2000 BEAUMONT, BURCHETT & EMMETT JJ 8 SEPTEMBER 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 543 OF 2000
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: FIRST NETCOM PTY LIMITED
APPELLANT
AND: TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED
RESPONDENT JUDGE: BEAUMONT, BURCHETT & EMMETT JJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate