Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kathiravelu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1279
IMMIGRATION – Refugee – application by elderly Tamil woman for protection visa refused – refusal affirmed by Refugee Review Tribunal – extortion practised against applicant by Tamils opposed to Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and by Sri Lankan police – motivation for extortion – whether for Convention ground of race – mixed motivations – perceived wealth – harbouring of suspected LTTE member.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476(1)(a), (e) Perampalam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999)84 FCR 274, referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Sarrazola (1999)95 FCR 517, referred to Ram v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 57 FCR 565, referred to Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225, distinguished Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1998) 94 FCR 28, distinguished NAGESWARI KATHIRAVELU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1145 OF 1999 LINDGREN J 11 SEPTEMBER 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1145 OF 1999
BETWEEN: NAGESWARI KATHIRAVELU
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LINDGREN J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 SEPTEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1145 OF 1999
BETWEEN: NAGESWARI KATHIRAVELU
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate