Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rahardja v Republic of Indonesia [2000] FCA 1297
EXTRADITION – Appeal against decision dismissing application for review of magistrate's determination that appellant is eligible for surrender in respect of two offences – Whether primary judge erred in holding there was no extradition objection – Claim that there are substantial grounds for believing that appellant might be prejudiced at his trial or punished by reason of his race – Whether evidence established that claim – Whether Indonesian supporting documents sufficiently indicated the conduct giving rise to the relevant offences – Admissibility of supporting documents – Whether supporting documents properly authenticated. Extradition Act 1988, ss7(c), 19, 20, 21 and 22 Prabowo v Republic of Indonesia (1995) 61 FCR 258 discussed and distinguished HENDRA RAHARDJA v REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA N531 of 2000 WILCOX, SPENDER and DOWSETT JJ SYDNEY 14 SEPTEMBER 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N531 of 2000
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: HENDRA RAHARDJA
Appellant
AND: REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
Respondent
JUDGE: WILCOX, SPENDER and DOWSETT JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 14 SEPTEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant, Hendra Rahardja, pay the costs of the respondent, Republic of Indonesia. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N531 of 2000
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: HENDRA RAHARDJA
Appellant
AND: REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
Respondent
JUDGE: WILCOX, SPENDER and DOWSETT JJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate